ACCOUNTABILITY
|
|
Facilitator: Andrew Phelps,
Accountability
Caucus, Berkeley, CA
|
Co-Facilitator: Maria Maceira,
Accountability
Caucus, Modesto, CA
|
Maturing the consumer/survivor movement
|
Issue:
The consumer/survivor movement is habituated to a bitter
struggle for empowerment. As the movement matures, becoming
broader and more deeply entrenched, it needs to become
sensitized to issues of accountability that win
people personal respect from each other and from society.
|
Background:
- The struggle for empowerment starts as a struggle for
raw power in a hostile, behaviorally managed situation. Like
the suffragists of the 19th century, the clients had to think
"power" and accommodate tokenism. As with the feminists of the
late 20th century, the movement moves over as it matures to
issues of respect for ones way of being. The Summit
with its emphasis on reconciliation and mutual recognition
of boundaries reflects how this fact is slowly dawning on us.
- The winning of respect relates to when we modify the
behavior of the system rather than the reverse. To hold the
system to account for its behavior, we have habituated ourselves
to a regime of advocacy, self-help, and the like (count em,
its 11 planks here!). We need to go from habituation
experiences over to sensitization experiences. The
White House Conference on Mental Illness shows how deep the
need is to teach society about the true nature of ourselves,
about madness itself.
- Our world today is ruled by entitlement motivators, such
as SSI, Section 8, Medicare, etc. This sort of low-functioning
social accommodation is insufficient. The full expression of
our being as persons of quality is our real entitlement on
this Earth. The prospect of working together cooperatively
means we must train the clients in empowerment as a way of
being, which means above all accountability to the client
values to the client culture.
- The opposite of sensitization is trauma. Trauma
comes to us via our personal histories of abuse and also via the
system's treatment regimes. NAMI and the psychiatric system
are deeply enmeshed in advocacies for institutionalizing and
reinforcing traumatic outcomes. But people, ordinary non-clients,
do not want a traumatized world, and we can build coalitions
with people based on mutual opposition to traumatizing practices.
|
|
Client culture and human relations
|
Issue:
Client values need to be articulated and sustained so that the
client culture/resistance will flourish in a support environment
laced with trauma. Currently strained human relations in the client
culture are commonplace, and wholesome involvement with society
is too little realized.
|
Background:
- We have to talk about a client culture and a client
psychology. The client culture is a social space
where the networking that will help manage and overcome
the trauma lives and grows. A client psychology will have
to explain the way of being in this client culture.
Professionals today commonly lack insight into the
real experience of madness and those struggling with
madness.
- How do we explain our spiritual beings and communicate
in ways that are mutually respectful? The backbone of a
new Vision of human relations is upgrading our advocacy of
core values. Key work areas include (1) the ethics of
personal interaction, (2) discrimination/tokenism
on a micro level, (3) respect for personal sensitivity and
empathy, and (4) a humanist rather than rationalist
paradigm in psychology. We need to cultivate broader
and richer expression and acceptance of our symbolic life.
- Some of the legacy of the years of struggle for raw power
is deep bitterness. We are learning that we cant solve our
conflicts by steamrollering the
opposition. The Summit
is an exploration in how to reconcile all this bitterness. We
hope for restorative rather
than retributive outcomes,
yes, but much creative work remains to be done.
- The key to full independence is good and wise coalition.
In society today "thats crazy!" is a
synonym for "thats a
mistake." Thats crazy! Er, its a mistake, and we must
train society to treat us more gently. We can work with
enlightened people to build a new society where madness
will be dealt with sensibly because human relations will be
handled better.
|
|
|